MINDING YOUR BUSINESS
Women shorted on federal
contracts
Government favoring bigger firms, failing to meet annual
5% goal
By Ann
Meyer
Special to
the Tribune
Published
April 17, 2006
Nabbing a federal government contract helped put
Carolyne Turner's financial software company on the
map 25 years ago, but today the federal procurement process has led the $2
million firm to more dead ends than new deals.
Turner's Chicago-based Information Development Consultants Inc. (iDC) rings up about $400,000 each year from its accounting
software developed for the federal government, but the bulk of the company's
revenue comes from state and local governments, said Turner, the company's
founder and president.
It's harder than ever for small businesses to win federal contracts, she said.
"The perception just is not there that a small business can do the job
like a big business can," she said. "The federal government is still
looking for the big name, because the big name is the safe solution."
Turner isn't the only one who has noticed that large corporations continue to
win the lion's share of federal government contracts. It's been a bone of
contention, particularly among business groups with a large number of women or
minority business owners.
In fact, despite the federal government's pledge to award 5 percent of federal
contracts to women-owned small businesses, it routinely falls short of that
goal, said U.S. Rep. Nydia Velazquez of
It's not a new problem. Six years ago, Congress recognized it, enacting
legislation that set aside contracts in certain male-dominated industries for
competition by women-owned businesses, said Margot Dorfman,
chief executive of the U.S. Women's Chamber of Commerce. But the Small Business
Administration has yet to implement the law, Dorfman
said.
When the women's chamber filed a complaint in U.S. District Court last fall to
get the Women's Procurement Program up and running, the judge found the Small
Business Administration's delay in getting the program going
"unreasonable" and ordered it to get moving.
"Now they have to do it. The courts are watching," Dorfman said.
Every year that goes by, women-owned firms miss out on as much as $5 billion in
set-aside contracting, she said.
Improvement is sorely need, said Velazquez, who gave the government a grade of
"D" on contracting with small businesses in her most recent
scorecard.
"When it comes to women business owners, the federal government is getting
worse," she said. "Women-owned businesses are the fastest-growing
sector in our economy. They need to be represented within the federal
market."
U.S. Rep. Don Manzullo (R-Ill.), chairman of the House Small Business
Committee, also "has been very concerned about procurement for a long
time," said spokesman Rich Carter. "We encourage government agencies
to not just reach their goal but surpass it."
In 2004, the government met its overall small-business goal, with small
businesses receiving 23 percent of federal prime-contracting dollars, Carter
said. Women-owned businesses, however, received 3 percent, falling short of the
5 percent goal, he said.
The problem is partly a matter of educating federal contracting officers that
women deserve a chance, Velazquez said.
Turner's company emphasizes customized Web-based solutions for government
applications. And when the firm bids on a federal job, it often is notified
that it is a finalist, but usually the contracts end up going to much larger,
well-known corporations, she said.
"It just kills me," Turner said. "They tell us, `Yes, you had a
good solution or idea, but we decided to stick with IBM.'"
"Nobody ever got fired for choosing IBM and Microsoft," she said.
What's more, by bundling numerous small jobs into one large contract, federal
agencies have exacerbated the problem, because small firms can't compete for a
$100 million contract, Dorfman said.
Despite the frustration of small-business groups, some experts see ripples of
progress, as large corporations increasingly seek to subcontract with women-
and minority-owned firms.
"Over 700 of the
Fortune 1000 have formal supplier diversity programs," said Mike Anguiano,
president of CVM Diversity Quest, an Oakbrook Terrace-based minority-owned
provider of supplier diversity data and technology.
With the government and large corporations increasingly requiring suppliers to
report how much money they spend on women- and minority-owned businesses,
Anguiano said, "there's a big trickle-down effect."
Winning a sizable contract can help move a business to the next level, said
Susan Phillips Bari, president of the Women's Business Enterprise National
Council in Washington, whose women-owned member companies average $7.5 million
in annual revenue.
"You have to be on the bidder list to even get the request for
proposal," she said.
Locally, Pam Ackerman, president and owner of Lockport-based Work Zone Safety,
is capitalizing on the trend. The company, which puts up barricades and detour
signs in road construction zones, has won a growing number of jobs without
dealing directly with government agencies.
Instead, Ackerman targets the large general contractors handling the jobs,
because they need to hire women- and minority-owned subcontractors to comply
with diversity-spending stipulations from state highway authorities.
Ackerman has been getting a warmer reception from general contractors since the
Illinois Department of Transportation increased its focus on disadvantaged
business enterprises, including women-owned companies in male-dominated fields,
she said.
"That really opened the door for me in 2005," she said. "Road
construction definitely is a man's field, but I was given the opportunity to
help them out because they need to fulfill those numbers."
Still, as Anguiano points
out, being a woman- or minority-owned business doesn't guarantee contracts.
"It definitely helps get in the door," he said, "but once you're
in the door, you're judged the same way any other company is judged--on
quality, qualifications, pricing and delivery."
Copyright © 2006, Chicago
Tribune